| |
Invited to
join an Oxfam delegation to Mali in West Africa
in December, 2004, I spoke to cotton farmers
in Mali in their fields about two hours outside
Bamako, that country's capital. Mali, the
fourth poorest country on earth, sits above
Sierra Leone and Ghana, east of Senegal, and
is bordered on the north by Algeria. Mostly
sub-Sahara desert and uninhabitable, its vast,
forbidding landscape gives way in the south
to arable land, entirely dependent on rainfall
since there are no irrigation systems.
The primary crop-the only exportable crop-of
Mali is cotton, and it directly determines
the income and welfare of 3.8 million of Mali's
10 million people. Cotton farmers earn about
$1 a day, on average, and farm about 6 to
10 acres, often inter-planted with "cereal"-their
term for maize and millet. That exported cotton
also supports Mali's democratic government.
Since Mali is landlocked, high transportation
costs to ports across the Ivory Coast and
other coastal countries cut into profits-especially
when civil wars, like the one raging in Ivory
Coast, jeopardize transport reliability and
safety.
The American wing of Oxfam, the international
non-profit whose mission is to improve the
standard of living and to provide basic
necessities to inhabitants of poor countries,
and to call attention to social injustice,
launched a campaign in 2004 to call attention
to dumping. That practice of putting cotton
or any other commodity on the market for
sale below the cost of production can only
be supported by government subsidies. In
the case of American cotton, the U.S. government
now spends $3.2 billion to subsidize America's
25,000 cotton growers. The top 10 percent
get about 80 percent of the money-or $512,000
per individual per year.
How does all that affect countries in
West Africa like Mali, and its cotton-growing
neighbors, Benin and Burkina Faso? It further
bankrupts their desperate economies, because
the subsidized American cotton competes
directly against West African cotton on
the international market.
"Trade distortion" is the formal name.
Near-starvation for millions of families
comes closer to the truth. The cotton that
is hand-picked, as in these images, and
cultivated using oxen and hand-plows, now
costs more for these farmers to grow and
process than they can get for it, largely
due to the dumped American cotton that has
helped depress world prices to record lows
. In a bumper year like 2004, with supply
exceeding demand, Malians and others find
themselves a life-and-death crisis. Most
Malian women can no longer afford the $2
a month required to pay for their children's
schooling. The weakened dollar works against
them as well, since they buy their "inputs"
in West African francs pegged to the Euro
and sell into Asian markets pegged to the
declining dollar.
Oxfam America has taken the lead among
non-governmental agencies in calling this
sorry situation to the attention of the
American public . The delegation it sponsored
met with the president of Mali, Amadou Toumani
Touré, and high-level members of his administration.
All expressed their immediate need for assistance.
"We're crying for help and nobody's listening,"
Mali's prime minister said. " All of us
can feel your raw pain," Mary Robinson,
Oxfam's spokesperson, responded. For anyone
in the delegation, it was impossible not
feel and absorb it in the dusty, barren
streets and fields. Still, the current administration
and Congress do not appear to be inclined
to make any near-term changes in our country's
cotton-farm policy , despite a World Trade
Organization protest by Brazil and West
African countries.
In an impoverished, democratic Islamic country,
our cotton dumping foments the rage that we
are trying to quell, hoping to reduce the
conditions that breed terrorism. Malians generally
maintain a sense of buoyancy and are known
for their pleasant dispositions. The Burkina
Faso people are known for their sense of humor.
But prolonged unjust treatment can foul the
mood of anyone-especially when their children
go hungry. |
|